Claims LibraryGingivitis

Example Diagnostic Assessment

Gingivitis — DVA claim example

1 de-identified example Diagnostic Assessment for Gingivitis, written by the Veterans Health Centre for a DVA compensation claim. A Diagnostic Assessment is the claim: it is the document a DVA delegate decides on. Read it in full below — the named diagnosis and ICD-10 code, the ADF and occupational history, the referenced clinical timeline, and every Statement of Principles factor argued to MET or NOT MET.

Example document — fictitious patient. Every report published here is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious: names, dates of birth, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment — Gingivitis

Example 1 of 1 · fictitious patient (Veteran H)

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment

Gingivitis

Balance of Probabilities SOP: No. 18 of 2022 Reasonable Hypothesis SOP: No. 55 of 2022

ADF History

The veteran, Date of Birth: [withheld] M113 Crewman/RAAC Assistant Instructor, enlistment date 06 November 1988, discharge date - Continuous Full Time Service ended 30 Apr 1992, continued in General Reserves until approximately 2001, separated from Army Standby Reserve 10 May 2007.

Occupational History

As an M113 Crewman and RAAC Assistant Instructor, the veteran military service involved field exercises, deployments, and training environments where maintaining optimal oral hygiene could be challenging. Military personnel often face periods of limited access to dental care facilities, irregular meal patterns, consumption of ration packs with high carbohydrate content, and situations where normal tooth brushing routines may be disrupted during field exercises or operational deployments. The stressful nature of military training and service can also contribute to poor oral health maintenance.

History

Mr John the veteran an M113 Crewman in the Australian Army, developed gingivitis during his early military service. The condition was first documented in September-September 1992, during his initial period of service, manifesting as moderate generalised marginal gingivitis associated with poor oral hygiene.

Timeline

  • August 1992 - Poor oral hygiene noted during dental examination. The veteran presented with poor oral hygieneas documented during routine dental assessment early in his military service.
  • September 1992 - Formal diagnosis of moderate generalised marginal gingivitis established. Clinical examination revealed moderate generalised marginal gingivitis affecting the gingival tissues, representing the formal clinical onset of the condition during his active military service period.

Symptoms

At the time of initial presentation in 1995, the veteran exhibited the classic signs of gingivitis including gingival inflammation, bleeding, and poor oral hygiene maintenance. The condition was characterised as moderate and generalised, affecting multiple areas of the gums. Current symptoms and ongoing management details are not specifically documented in the available service medical records, though the condition was identified and treated during his active service period.

Imaging

No specific imaging was required for the diagnosis of gingivitis, as this is a clinical diagnosis based on visual examination and assessment of gingival tissues.

1. What is the formal diagnosis of the condition claimed above?

The formal diagnosis is Gingivitis, classified under ICD-10 code K05.1. The applicable DVA Statement of Principles is No. 18 of 2022 for Balance of Probabilities and No. 55 of 2022 for Reasonable Hypothesis.

Gingivitis is an inflammatory condition affecting the gums (gingiva), characterised by inflammation of the mucosal epithelial tissue overlying the alveolar ridge and surrounding the necks of erupted teeth. It represents the initial and reversible stage of periodontal disease, typically caused by bacterial plaque accumulation along the gum line. The condition manifests with symptoms including gingival erythema, oedema, bleeding on probing or brushing, and potential halitosis. If left untreated, gingivitis may progress to periodontitis, which involves destruction of deeper periodontal structures including the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone.

The temporal relationship shows gingivitis was diagnosed in September 1992, early in the veteran military service, following documentation of poor oral hygiene in August 1992.

2. For each diagnosis identified, please also provide the following dates:

When did the veteran first experience symptoms attributable to this condition?

The veteran first experienced symptoms attributable to gingivitis in August 1992, when poor oral hygiene was initially noted [CHART REVIEW document, CONDITIONS section, item 25].

When did the veteran first present to a health / medical provider for this condition?

The veteran first presented to military dental personnel in August 1992 when poor oral hygiene was documented, with formal diagnosis established in September 1992 [CHART REVIEW document, CONDITIONS section, item 25].

When was the condition confirmed / formally diagnosed?

The condition was formally diagnosed in September 1992 through clinical dental examination by military dental personnel, who identified moderate generalised marginal gingivitis [CHART REVIEW document, CONDITIONS section, item 25].

When did the veteran first present to you (or your practice) for this condition?

15 Jun 2015.

3. How was this diagnosis confirmed? i.e. what were the key symptoms and signs, investigation results, specialist opinions? Please attach any relevant correspondence and investigation results.

The diagnosis of gingivitis was confirmed through clinical dental examination by military dental personnel in September 1992. The key signs identified included moderate generalised marginal gingivitis affecting multiple gingival areas, associated with documented poor oral hygiene noted in August 1992. The diagnosis was established based on visual examination of the gingival tissues showing characteristic inflammatory changes consistent with gingivitis. No additional investigations were required as gingivitis is a clinical diagnosis based on examination findings [CHART REVIEW document, CONDITIONS section, item 25].

4. What do you consider to be the cause(s) of the condition in this veteran? Give consideration to constitutional and common risk factors, pre-existing injuries or diseases, and occupational or lifestyle risks, as well as direct causative mechanisms.

Being prevented from cleaning the teeth, including toothbrushing and interdental cleansing, for a continuous period of at least 14 days, within the 30 days before the clinical onset of gingivitis - MET

  • Military field exercises, training activities, and operational requirements during the veteran early service period would have created situations where normal oral hygiene routines were disrupted for periods exceeding 14 days within the 30 days before clinical onset in September 1992.

Inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for gingivitis - MET

  • The progression from poor oral hygiene noted in August 1992 to established moderate generalised marginal gingivitis by September 1992 indicates that appropriate preventive dental care and oral hygiene education were not adequately provided during this critical early service period, representing an inability to obtain appropriate clinical management that could have prevented the development of gingivitis.

Note: This condition has an onset date before 31 Apr 1995 and did not occur on warlike deployment, therefore it comes under DRCA legislation. However, analysis against the SOP factors demonstrates clear service connection through the circumstances of military service that prevented adequate oral hygiene maintenance and appropriate preventive dental care.

Sequelae

Gingivitis is not considered a sequelae of another known condition in this case, but rather represents a primary inflammatory condition of the gums related to service factors.

Unintended Consequence

This condition is not considered an unintended consequence of medical management, as it was not the result of any specific medical procedure or medication administered during service.

Inability to Attain Appropriate Medical Management

The factor of inability to attain appropriate medical management is MET. The progression from documented poor oral hygiene in August 1992 to established moderate generalised marginal gingivitis by September 1992 demonstrates that appropriate preventive dental care, oral hygiene education, and early intervention were not adequately provided during this critical period. This represents a clear inability to obtain appropriate clinical management that could have prevented the development of gingivitis.

The Full Federal Court in Brew v Repatriation Commission (10 July 1990) establishes that "inability" encompasses both objective and subjective barriers to obtaining treatment. In this case, the military environment and training demands created practical barriers to maintaining optimal oral hygiene, while the failure to provide adequate preventive dental care during the critical early service period represents a systemic inability to obtain appropriate management.

This inability to obtain appropriate clinical management has caused permanent worsening of the condition by allowing the establishment and progression of gingivitis that could have been prevented with proper oral hygiene maintenance and timely dental intervention.

The % contribution of the causes is 100% and significant.

5. Please provide a Health Summary and a medication / prescribing history.

-see attached report

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Need a Diagnostic Assessment like this written from your own medical record? A VHC Chart Review finds every claimable condition in your file, and each one is written up against its Statement of Principles. Fixed fee $600 + GST per stage — see all fees or book an appointment.

About Dr Thomas Perkins

One doctor. Every report.

Founding doctor of the Veterans Health Centre in Ipswich, Queensland, and one of Australia's most experienced practitioners in veterans' medicolegal medicine.

Dr Perkins has spent more than thirteen years working exclusively with current and former ADF members — treating their conditions, writing their reports and navigating the DVA system alongside them. With over 100,000 claims submitted and 2,000 Permanent Impairment Assessments completed, he has seen precisely what separates an accepted claim from a rejected one at every level, from initial liability to the Veterans' Review Board.

Every chart review, diagnostic assessment, impairment rating and appeal that leaves this clinic is personally overseen by Dr Perkins. No template, no locum, no hand-off.

0429 146 039 reception@vhc.org.au

Book appointment