Claims LibraryAsthma - Clinical Worsening

Example Diagnostic Assessment

Asthma - Clinical Worsening — DVA claim example

1 de-identified example Diagnostic Assessment for Asthma - Clinical Worsening, written by the Veterans Health Centre for a DVA compensation claim. A Diagnostic Assessment is the claim: it is the document a DVA delegate decides on. Read it in full below — the named diagnosis and ICD-10 code, the ADF and occupational history, the referenced clinical timeline, and every Statement of Principles factor argued to MET or NOT MET.

Example document — fictitious patient. Every report published here is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious: names, dates of birth, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment — Asthma - Clinical Worsening

Example 1 of 1 · fictitious patient (Veteran H)

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment

Asthma - Clinical Worsening

SOP Codes: Balance of Probabilities: No. 32 of 2021 Reasonable Hypothesis: No. 31 of 2021

ADF History

Name: The veteran Date of Birth: [withheld]
Occupation: M113 Crewman, RAAC Assistant Instructor Enlistment Date: 06 November 1988 Discharge Date: Continuous Full Time Service ended 30 Apr 1992, General Reserves until approximately 2001, Army Standby Reserve until 10 May 2007

Occupational History

As an M113 Crewman in the Royal Australian Armoured Corps, the veteran service involved significant exposure to diesel fumes, particulate matter, and environmental irritants. His duties included operating armoured vehicles in dusty environments, exposure to vehicle exhaust systems, and deployment to an overseas deployment where he encountered smoke foggers used as mosquito deterrents. The role required physical exertion in potentially compromised air quality environments and exposure to various airborne irritants during vehicle maintenance and operations.

History

Mr. John the veteran developed respiratory symptoms including wheeze and chest tightness during his military service, particularly following his deployment to an overseas deployment, consistent with asthma exacerbation in the setting of occupational and environmental exposures.

Timeline

  • 24 Mar 1992 the veteran presented with wheezy tight chest after returning from an overseas deployment deployment. Medical assessment noted history of childhood asthma and he was treated with Ventolin (bronchodilator) and Flixotide (inhaled corticosteroid), indicating clinical recognition of asthma symptoms requiring standard asthma management.
  • 08 Mar 1992 Earlier presentation documented flu symptoms, wheeze, productive cough with diagnosis of acute bronchitis. The presence of wheeze suggests bronchial hyperresponsiveness consistent with underlying asthma pathophysiology exacerbated by respiratory infection.

Symptoms

At the time of presentations in Apr 1995, the veteran experienced wheezy chest, chest tightness, productive cough, and flu-like symptoms. These symptoms occurred following his an overseas deployment deployment and were consistent with asthma exacerbation. The symptoms were severe enough to require prescription bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory treatment typical of asthma management. The temporal relationship between deployment exposures and symptom onset suggests occupational triggers contributed to the clinical worsening.

Imaging

No specific respiratory imaging findings documented in the available records for these presentations.

1. What is the formal diagnosis of the condition claimed above?

The formal diagnosis is Asthma - Clinical Worsening, applying SOP codes No. 32 of 2021 (Balance of Probabilities) and No. 31 of 2021 (Reasonable Hypothesis), with ICD-10 code J45.9 (Asthma, unspecified).

Asthma is a chronic disorder of the airways characterised by variable and recurring symptoms, variable airflow obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and underlying inflammation. Clinical worsening of asthma refers to a change in the nature of asthma resulting in persistent change from well-controlled to poorly controlled asthma, persistent increase in treatment requirements, episodes of severe asthma, or increased hospitalisation requirements.

The veteran's presentation demonstrates clinical worsening of pre-existing asthma (childhood history) with acute exacerbation requiring medical intervention and prescription asthma medications following occupational exposures during military service.

2. For each diagnosis identified, please also provide the following dates:

When did the veteran first experience symptoms attributable to this condition? Apr 1995, with documented presentations on 08 Mar 1992 and 24 Mar 1992.

When did the veteran first present to a health/medical provider for this condition? 08 Mar 1992 to military medical officer for flu symptoms and wheeze, followed by 24 Mar 1992 presentation for wheezy tight chest.

When was the condition confirmed/formally diagnosed? 24 Mar 1992 when treated with specific asthma medications (Ventolin and Flixotide) by military medical officer, indicating clinical recognition of asthma exacerbation.

When did the veteran first present to you (or your practice) for this condition? 16 August 2015.

3. How was this diagnosis confirmed? i.e. what were the key symptoms and signs, investigation results, specialist opinions? Please attach any relevant correspondence and investigation results.

The diagnosis was confirmed through clinical assessment by military medical personnel who recognised the constellation of respiratory symptoms (wheeze, chest tightness, productive cough) in the context of known childhood asthma history. The prescription of standard asthma medications (Ventolin bronchodilator and Flixotide inhaled corticosteroid) confirms clinical recognition of asthma exacerbation requiring appropriate pharmacological intervention. The temporal relationship between an overseas deployment deployment exposures and symptom onset supports occupational triggering of asthma worsening.

4. What do you consider to be the cause(s) of the condition in this veteran? Give consideration to constitutional and common risk factors, pre-existing injuries or diseases, and occupational or lifestyle risks, as well as direct causative mechanisms.

Being exposed to an immunologic or non-immunologic stimulus within the 24 hours before the clinical worsening of asthma - MET

  • The veteran was exposed to multiple respiratory irritants during his an overseas deployment deployment including diesel fumes throughout the tour, smoke foggers used as mosquito deterrents, and various airborne particulates from vehicle operations in dusty environments. These exposures occurred in the period leading up to his documented respiratory symptoms in Apr 1995.

Having been exposed to second-hand smoke for at least 1,000 hours within the one year before the clinical worsening of asthma - NOT MET

  • No evidence of significant second-hand smoke exposure meeting the threshold requirements.

Having a clinically significant depressive disorder for at least the six months before the clinical worsening of asthma - NOT MET

  • While anxiety and depression are documented conditions, there is no evidence these were present for six months prior to the Apr 1995 asthma worsening.

Having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease at the time of the clinical worsening of asthma - MET

  • The veteran experienced gastroesophageal symptoms in July 1994 related to Doxycycline medication, and gastroesophageal reflux can be a trigger for asthma symptoms.

Inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for asthma - MET

  • There is no evidence of ongoing asthma management or monitoring following the Apr 1995 presentations despite documented asthma exacerbation requiring medication. The absence of follow-up respiratory specialist referral or ongoing asthma action plan represents inability to obtain comprehensive asthma management during military service, leading to permanent worsening as evidenced by the need for DVA compensation claim.

Sequelae

This condition is not a sequelae of another known condition but rather represents clinical worsening of pre-existing childhood asthma due to occupational exposures.

Unintended Consequence

This condition is not an unintended consequence of medical management.

Inability to Attain Appropriate Medical Management

MET - Following the acute presentations in Apr 1995 where the veteran was treated for asthma exacerbation, there is no evidence of appropriate ongoing asthma management including specialist respiratory referral, development of asthma action plans, or regular monitoring. The Full Federal Court in Brew v Repatriation Commission (10 July 1990) established that "inability" encompasses both objective and subjective barriers to obtaining treatment. The military medical system's failure to provide comprehensive ongoing asthma management following acute exacerbation represents a clear inability to obtain appropriate clinical management, resulting in permanent worsening of the condition as evidenced by the veteran's need to seek DVA compensation decades later.

The % contribution of the causes is 100% and significant.

5. Please provide a Health Summary and a medication/prescribing history.

-see attached report

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Need a Diagnostic Assessment like this written from your own medical record? A VHC Chart Review finds every claimable condition in your file, and each one is written up against its Statement of Principles. Fixed fee $600 + GST per stage — see all fees or book an appointment.

About Dr Thomas Perkins

One doctor. Every report.

Founding doctor of the Veterans Health Centre in Ipswich, Queensland, and one of Australia's most experienced practitioners in veterans' medicolegal medicine.

Dr Perkins has spent more than thirteen years working exclusively with current and former ADF members — treating their conditions, writing their reports and navigating the DVA system alongside them. With over 100,000 claims submitted and 2,000 Permanent Impairment Assessments completed, he has seen precisely what separates an accepted claim from a rejected one at every level, from initial liability to the Veterans' Review Board.

Every chart review, diagnostic assessment, impairment rating and appeal that leaves this clinic is personally overseen by Dr Perkins. No template, no locum, no hand-off.

0429 146 039 reception@vhc.org.au

Book appointment