Claims LibraryDry Eye Syndrome

Example Diagnostic Assessment

Dry Eye Syndrome — DVA claim example

1 de-identified example Diagnostic Assessment for Dry Eye Syndrome, written by the Veterans Health Centre for a DVA compensation claim. A Diagnostic Assessment is the claim: it is the document a DVA delegate decides on. Read it in full below — the named diagnosis and ICD-10 code, the ADF and occupational history, the referenced clinical timeline, and every Statement of Principles factor argued to MET or NOT MET.

Example document — fictitious patient. Every report published here is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious: names, dates of birth, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment — Dry Eye Syndrome

Example 1 of 1 · fictitious patient (Veteran N)

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment

Dry Eye Syndrome (H04.1)

No Statement of Principles exists for Dry Eye Syndrome. This condition would be assessed under general principles of causation and service connection.

ADF History

The veteran, Chef, enlisted 09 January 2009, discharged 27 Mar 2016.

Occupational History

Military chefs are exposed to various environmental factors that may contribute to dry eye syndrome including exposure to cooking fumes and vapors, chemical irritants in cleaning agents and kitchen environments, dust and particulates during field exercises, chlorinated water in military swimming facilities, and various environmental irritants during training activities and deployment exercises.

History

The veteran the veteran a military chef, developed dry eye symptoms in July 2012 following exposure to chlorinated pool water during mandatory military physical training. The condition appears related to chemical exposure and environmental factors during his military service.

Timeline

  • 02 Jun 2010 - the veteran presented with irritated eyes following swimming in a chlorinated pool the previous day. He reported that his eyes were stinging with no visual changes and no secretions, specifically requesting eye drops for symptomatic relief. Eye examination revealed very slightly irritated eyes but no significant abnormalities were noted. He was provided with Bion Tears eye drops for symptomatic relief and educated on proper use.

Symptoms

Acute symptoms included eye stinging and irritation following chlorinated pool exposure. The symptoms were characterized by burning sensation without visual changes or discharge. Current symptoms from medical assessment may include ongoing dry eye symptoms with potential chronic irritation and need for artificial tears.

Imaging

No imaging was performed for dry eye syndrome.

1. What is the formal diagnosis of the condition claimed above?

Dry Eye Syndrome, ICD-10 code H04.1. No DVA SOP exists for this condition.

Dry eye syndrome is a condition resulting from inadequate tear production or excessive tear evaporation, leading to ocular surface inflammation and symptoms of discomfort. It can be caused by environmental factors, chemical exposure, medications, or underlying inflammatory conditions.

The condition represents an acute chemical exposure during military service with potential for chronic symptoms.

2. For each diagnosis identified, please also provide the following dates:

When did the veteran first experience symptoms attributable to this condition? 01 Jun 2010 (following chlorinated pool exposure).

When did the veteran first present to a health / medical provider for this condition? The veteran first presented to military medical personnel on 02 Jun 2010 for eye irritation symptoms.

When was the condition confirmed / formally diagnosed? The condition was confirmed and formally diagnosed on 02 Jun 2010 by military medical personnel who assessed the clinical presentation as dry eyes secondary to chemical irritation.

When did the veteran first present to you (or your practice) for this condition? 30 July 2018.

3. How was this diagnosis confirmed? i.e. what were the key symptoms and signs, investigation results, specialist opinions?

The diagnosis was confirmed through clinical assessment by military medical personnel. Key symptoms included eye stinging and irritation following chlorinated pool exposure, with no visual changes or secretions. Physical examination revealed slightly irritated eyes without significant abnormalities. Treatment response to artificial tears supported the diagnosis of chemical irritation causing dry eye symptoms.

4. What do you consider to be the cause(s) of the condition in this veteran?

Chemical exposure factors - Direct exposure to chlorinated pool water during mandatory military physical training caused acute chemical irritation of the ocular surface. MET - Documented temporal relationship between chlorinated pool exposure and onset of symptoms.

Environmental exposure factors - Military environment involves ongoing potential for eye irritation through various chemical and environmental exposures during training and occupational duties. MET - Military service inherently involves exposure to dust, chemicals, and environmental irritants that can exacerbate dry eye symptoms.

Occupational exposure factors - Work as a military chef involved exposure to cooking fumes, cleaning chemicals, and kitchen environments that may contribute to ongoing ocular surface irritation. MET - Kitchen environments involve exposure to various vapors and chemicals that can affect tear film stability.

Sequelae

This condition is not considered a sequelae of another known condition but represents a primary condition related to military service chemical exposure.

Unintended Consequence

This condition is not considered an unintended consequence of medical management.

Inability to Attain Appropriate Medical Management

The acute episode was treated symptomatically without comprehensive ophthalmological assessment or investigation into potential chronic dry eye syndrome. The Full Federal Court in Brew v Repatriation Commission established that inability includes both objective and subjective barriers to treatment. The lack of specialist ophthalmological referral and comprehensive management represents an inability to attain appropriate medical management that may have contributed to ongoing dry eye symptoms and permanent worsening of ocular surface health.

The % contribution of the causes is 100% and significant.

5. Please provide a Health Summary and a medication / prescribing history. -see attached report

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Need a Diagnostic Assessment like this written from your own medical record? A VHC Chart Review finds every claimable condition in your file, and each one is written up against its Statement of Principles. Fixed fee $600 + GST per stage — see all fees or book an appointment.

About Dr Thomas Perkins

One doctor. Every report.

Founding doctor of the Veterans Health Centre in Ipswich, Queensland, and one of Australia's most experienced practitioners in veterans' medicolegal medicine.

Dr Perkins has spent more than thirteen years working exclusively with current and former ADF members — treating their conditions, writing their reports and navigating the DVA system alongside them. With over 100,000 claims submitted and 2,000 Permanent Impairment Assessments completed, he has seen precisely what separates an accepted claim from a rejected one at every level, from initial liability to the Veterans' Review Board.

Every chart review, diagnostic assessment, impairment rating and appeal that leaves this clinic is personally overseen by Dr Perkins. No template, no locum, no hand-off.

0429 146 039 reception@vhc.org.au

Book appointment