Claims LibraryRight Forearm - Superficial Burn

Example Diagnostic Assessment

Right Forearm - Superficial Burn — DVA claim example

1 de-identified example Diagnostic Assessment for Right Forearm - Superficial Burn, written by the Veterans Health Centre for a DVA compensation claim. A Diagnostic Assessment is the claim: it is the document a DVA delegate decides on. Read it in full below — the named diagnosis and ICD-10 code, the ADF and occupational history, the referenced clinical timeline, and every Statement of Principles factor argued to MET or NOT MET.

Example document — fictitious patient. Every report published here is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious: names, dates of birth, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment — Right Forearm - Superficial Burn

Example 1 of 1 · fictitious patient (Veteran A)

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment

Right Forearm - Superficial Burn

Balance of Probabilities SOP - 2/2024 Reasonable Hypothesis SOP - 1/2024

ADF History

The veteran, Date of Birth: [withheld] occupation Aircraft Technician, enlistment date 18 Apr 1988, discharge date 22 October 1999.

Occupational History

As an Aircraft Technician in the Royal Australian Air Force, the veteran was exposed to numerous occupational hazards including working with aviation fuels, hydraulic fluids, lubricants, solvents, cleaning agents, adhesives, paint, and primer. Physical hazards included confined space entry (documented Fuel Tank Entry duties), awkward postures, heavy lifting, vibration from power tools, noise exposure, repetitive movements, working at heights, and exposure to extreme temperatures. He worked with specialized equipment related to F-111 aircraft maintenance, including exposure to fire starter cartridge fumes (documented in 2003).

History

The veteran the veteran an Aircraft Technician in the Royal Australian Air Force, sustained a superficial burn to his right forearm on January 28, 1996, when a hot exhaust pipe came into contact with his arm during the course of his duties.

Timeline

  • 18 Nov 1991: The veteran presented after having a hot exhaust pipe land on his right forearm, causing a superficial contact burn. Ran under cold water for approx 5 mins. No chemicals were involved in the incident. Physical examination revealed superficial burn with raised markings. Treatment included application of silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream, application of dressing, and tetanus status check.
  • 20 Nov 1991: The veteran presented for review of the burn to his forearm. Physical examination showed skin intact with small blisters present. The wound was left open to air as part of the management plan.

Symptoms

At the time of injury, the veteran experienced pain and heat at the contact site on his right forearm. Following the injury, he developed raised markings at the burn site and subsequently developed small blisters two days later. No signs of infection were noted during follow-up.

Currently, the burn has fully healed with no ongoing symptoms. The most recent comprehensive imaging in December 2020 did not note any residual scarring or long-term effects from this burn injury.

Imaging

No specific imaging was performed for this superficial burn injury.

  • What is the formal diagnosis of the condition claimed above? The formal diagnosis is superficial burn of the right forearm. This condition aligns with DVA SOP for Heat-Induced Burn (Balance of Probabilities - No. 2 of 2024, Reasonable Hypothesis - No. 1 of 2024) and has the ICD-10 code T24.139A.

Superficial burns, also known as first-degree burns, involve damage primarily to the epidermis (outer layer of skin). They are characterized by redness, minor swelling, and pain at the site of injury. Unlike deeper burns, they do not typically result in blistering, though in some cases minor blistering may occur. Superficial burns heal relatively quickly, usually within 7-10 days, and generally do not result in scarring.

The burn sustained by the veteran was consistent with a superficial burn, with initial presentation showing raised markings and follow-up showing intact skin with small blisters. The management approach of initial cooling, application of antimicrobial cream (silver sulfadiazine), and later leaving the wound open to air is standard treatment for superficial burns.

  • For each diagnosis identified, please also provide the following dates: When did the veteran first experience symptoms attributable to this condition? The veteran first experienced symptoms attributable to this condition on January 28, 1996, when the hot exhaust pipe came into contact with his right forearm during his duties as an Aircraft Technician.

When did the veteran first present to a health / medical provider for this condition? The veteran first presented to a health provider on January 28, 1996, immediately after the burn occurred. The provider who assessed him was not specifically named in the medical records, but the presentation was at a military medical facility.

When was the condition confirmed / formally diagnosed? The condition was formally diagnosed on January 28, 1996, at the time of initial presentation. The diagnosis was made based on the history of contact with a hot exhaust pipe and clinical examination showing a superficial burn with raised markings. The healthcare provider who made the diagnosis was not specifically named in the records.

When did the veteran first present to you (or your practice) for this condition? March 15, 2022

  • How was this diagnosis confirmed? i.e. what were the key symptoms and signs, investigation results, specialist opinions? Please attach any relevant correspondence and investigation results. The diagnosis of superficial burn to the right forearm was confirmed through:
  • History of injury - direct contact with a hot exhaust pipe
  • Clinical examination on January 28, 1996, revealing:
  • Superficial burn
  • Raised markings at the site of injury
  • Follow-up examination on January 30, 1996, showing:
  • Intact skin with small blisters
  • Appropriate healing progression

No specialized investigations were required as the diagnosis was clearly established through history and clinical examination. The pattern of injury was consistent with a heat-induced superficial burn, and the evolution of symptoms (initial burn followed by small blister formation) followed the expected clinical course for this type of injury.

  • What do you consider to be the cause(s) of the condition in this veteran? Give consideration to constitutional and common risk factors, pre-existing injuries or diseases, and occupational or lifestyle risks, as well as direct causative mechanisms.

Reasonable Hypothesis Factor 9(1): having exposure to a heat source sufficient to cause at least erythema at the affected area of the body at the time of the clinical onset of heat- induced burn MET

  • The veteran had direct contact with a hot exhaust pipe on his right forearm on January 28, 1996, during the course of his duties as an Aircraft Technician. This heat source was sufficient to cause not only erythema but also raised markings and subsequent blister formation, consistent with a superficial burn injury.

Balance of Probabilities Factor 9(1): having exposure to a heat source sufficient to cause at least erythema at the affected area of the body at the time of the clinical onset of heat- induced burn MET

  • The documented contact with a hot exhaust pipe on January 28, 1996, represents definitive exposure to a heat source sufficient to cause erythema. The clinical documentation describes a superficial burn with raised markings and subsequent blister formation, exceeding the minimum requirement of erythema.

This condition occurred before July 1, 2002, and did not occur on warlike deployment, making it subject to DRCA legislation. However, the analysis against SOP factors still shows a clear connection to service, as the injury occurred during the course of military duties.

The causal mechanism is straightforward: direct thermal injury from contact with a hot metal surface (exhaust pipe) during the performance of military duties as an Aircraft Technician.

Aircraft maintenance frequently involves working in close proximity to hot components, including exhaust systems, which presents an occupational hazard specific to this veteran's military role.

Sequelae

There are no identifiable sequelae from this superficial burn. The condition appears to have healed completely without complications or long-term effects.

Unintended Consequence

This condition does not appear to be an unintended consequence of medical management, as it was a direct result of occupational exposure to a hot exhaust pipe rather than a complication of medical treatment.

Inability to Attain Appropriate Medical Management

There was no inability to attain appropriate medical management in this case. The veteran received prompt and appropriate care for his burn injury, including immediate first aid (cooling under water for 5 minutes), appropriate wound management (application of silver sulfadiazine cream and dressing), tetanus status assessment, and appropriate follow-up care.

The % contribution of the causes is 100% and significant

  • Please provide a Health Summary and a medication / prescribing history. -see attached report
Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Need a Diagnostic Assessment like this written from your own medical record? A VHC Chart Review finds every claimable condition in your file, and each one is written up against its Statement of Principles. Fixed fee $600 + GST per stage — see all fees or book an appointment.

About Dr Thomas Perkins

One doctor. Every report.

Founding doctor of the Veterans Health Centre in Ipswich, Queensland, and one of Australia's most experienced practitioners in veterans' medicolegal medicine.

Dr Perkins has spent more than thirteen years working exclusively with current and former ADF members — treating their conditions, writing their reports and navigating the DVA system alongside them. With over 100,000 claims submitted and 2,000 Permanent Impairment Assessments completed, he has seen precisely what separates an accepted claim from a rejected one at every level, from initial liability to the Veterans' Review Board.

Every chart review, diagnostic assessment, impairment rating and appeal that leaves this clinic is personally overseen by Dr Perkins. No template, no locum, no hand-off.

0429 146 039 reception@vhc.org.au

Book appointment