Claims LibraryURTI - Sinusitis

Example Diagnostic Assessment

URTI - Sinusitis — DVA claim example

1 de-identified example Diagnostic Assessment for URTI - Sinusitis, written by the Veterans Health Centre for a DVA compensation claim. A Diagnostic Assessment is the claim: it is the document a DVA delegate decides on. Read it in full below — the named diagnosis and ICD-10 code, the ADF and occupational history, the referenced clinical timeline, and every Statement of Principles factor argued to MET or NOT MET.

Example document — fictitious patient. Every report published here is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious: names, dates of birth, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment — URTI - Sinusitis

Example 1 of 1 · fictitious patient (Veteran D)

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Diagnostic Assessment

URTI - Sinusitis

SOP Bulletin No. 73/2018 - Sinusitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) SOP Bulletin No. 74/2018 - Sinusitis (Balance of Probabilities)

ADF History

The veteran, Airfield Defence Guard, enlisted 29 July 1993, currently serving.

Occupational History

As an Airfield Defence Guard (ADG) in the Royal Australian Air Force, the veteran was exposed to various occupational hazards. These included physical stressors from manual handling of heavy equipment, exposure to noise from weapons firing and aircraft operations, environmental exposures (UV radiation, heat, cold, dust, airborne particulates), vibration from vehicles and weapons, chemical exposures (fuels, oils, solvents), and psychological stressors inherent in military service. Post-deployment health screens note exposure to environmental dust in Kabul, AMAB, and KAF, as well as diesel exhaust fumes and fuels, with environmental health measures showing air quality at double the Australian standard. The Health Surveillance Questionnaire also consistently noted exposure to noise from flightlines and weapons range activities.

History

The veteran an Airfield Defence Guard in the RAAF, experienced episodes of sinusitis during his service. Notably, in January 2014, he presented with a two-week history of purulent cough, congestion, and tender sinuses that was not improving despite initial treatment.

Timeline

  • 04 Nov 2011. Presented to the base clinic with a 2-week history of sore throat and productive cough, which had initially improved then worsened, associated with fatigue and malaise. Examination revealed a clear chest and no throat redness (tonsils removed). Diagnosed with an acute upper respiratory tract infection, likely viral, and advised symptomatic relief.
  • 16 Nov 2011. Re-presented to the base clinic with a 2-week history of purulent cough that was not improving. He felt very unwell. Examination found his chest clear. He was diagnosed with acute bronchitis and prescribed Amoxycillin. Symptoms also included dry cough, congestion, body ache, and tender sinuses.
  • 22 Nov 2017. Presented to the base health centre with an ongoing productive cough (clear sputum) for 6 weeks, worse in mornings, following a cold. Concerned due to previous pneumonia. Examination noted nasal congestion, clear chest. Prescribed Doxycycline for possible sinus cause and referred for CXR. CXR on 26 Nov 2017 was clear.

Symptoms

At the time of his sinusitis episodes, the veteran reported symptoms including nasal congestion, tender sinuses, productive cough, and purulent discharge. His sinusitis was often associated with upper respiratory tract symptoms including dry cough, fatigue, body aches, and malaise. The condition appeared to be recurrent in nature, with multiple presentations for similar symptoms over the years. His most recent presentation in January 2020 included a persistent productive cough lasting 6 weeks with nasal congestion, where Doxycycline was prescribed for possible sinus involvement.

Imaging

26 Nov 2017: X-Ray Chest: "Lungs and pleura are clear. Cardiomediastinal contour is unremarkable. No suspicious osseous lesion identified." Diagnosis: Chest - Clear.

1. What is the formal diagnosis of the condition claimed above?

Sinusitis (ICD-10 code: J01.90); DVA SOP No. 73/2018 (Reasonable Hypothesis) and No. 74/2018 (Balance of Probabilities).

Sinusitis, also known as rhinosinusitis, is defined as inflammation of the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses. It encompasses both acute and chronic forms. The condition is characterized by nasal blockage or congestion, nasal discharge (anterior or postnasal drip), facial pain or pressure, reduction or loss of smell, and fluid within the sinuses. Sinusitis often occurs secondary to viral upper respiratory tract infections and can be exacerbated by bacterial or fungal overgrowth in the congested sinuses. Structural issues affecting sinus drainage, environmental factors, and immunological conditions can predispose individuals to developing sinusitis or experiencing recurrent episodes.

The patient's sinusitis appears to be related to his recurring upper respiratory tract infections, which may be influenced by his occupational exposures as an Airfield Defence Guard, including exposure to environmental dust, pollution, and various airborne contaminants during deployments.

2. For each diagnosis identified, please also provide the following dates:

When did the veteran first experience symptoms attributable to this condition? The veteran appears to have first experienced documented symptoms attributable to sinusitis around January 2014, when he presented with sore throat, productive cough, and ultimately tender sinuses during his visits to the base clinic.

When did the veteran first present to a health / medical provider for this condition? The veteran first presented to a health provider for symptoms consistent with sinusitis on 04 November 2011, when he visited the base clinic with a 2-week history of sore throat and productive cough. The follow-up visit on 16 November 2011 specifically documented tender sinuses as part of his symptom complex.

When was the condition confirmed / formally diagnosed? The condition was formally identified as sinusitis during his follow-up visit on 16 November 2011 at the base clinic, when tender sinuses were documented as part of his symptom complex, although the primary diagnosis recorded at that time was acute bronchitis.

When did the veteran first present to you (or your practice) for this condition? April 12, 2022.

3. How was this diagnosis confirmed? i.e. what were the key symptoms and signs, investigation results, specialist opinions? Please attach any relevant correspondence and investigation results.

The diagnosis of sinusitis was confirmed based on clinical presentation and examination findings. Key symptoms included nasal congestion, tender sinuses on palpation, purulent cough, and associated upper respiratory symptoms. The condition appeared to be persistent and recurrent, as evidenced by multiple presentations over the years. In January 2020, the possible sinus cause of his persistent cough was recognized with the prescription of Doxycycline as treatment. While specific sinus imaging was not documented, the clinical picture was consistent with sinusitis based on symptoms and physical examination findings. The chest X-ray performed on March 25, 2022, was clear, which helped rule out lower respiratory tract pathology as the cause of his symptoms.

4. What do you consider to be the cause(s) of the condition in this veteran? Give consideration to constitutional and common risk factors, pre-existing injuries or diseases, and occupational or lifestyle risks, as well as direct causative mechanisms.

having a viral, bacterial or fungal respiratory tract infection at the time of the clinical onset of sinusitis

  • MET. The medical records indicate the veteran had symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection preceding and concurrent with the sinusitis symptoms. His presentation on March 2, 2016, with a 2-week history of sore throat and productive cough, initially diagnosed as an acute upper respiratory tract infection, and the subsequent development of sinusitis symptoms by March 14, 2016, establish a clear temporal relationship between the respiratory infection and sinusitis.

inhaling airborne dusts, smoke from fires, or fumes or vapours from fuel or a chemical agent within the 48 hours before the clinical onset of sinusitis

  • MET. As an Airfield Defence Guard with multiple deployments, the veteran had documented exposure to environmental dust, particularly during his deployment to areas like Kabul, AMAB, and KAF. The Post Deployment Health Screen specifically notes "environment dust in Kabul & AMAB & KAF" as a daily exposure above normal duty levels. While we cannot establish a direct 48-hour timeline between specific exposures and each sinusitis episode, the chronic and repeated nature of these exposures likely contributed to his susceptibility to sinusitis.

having a specified medical condition at the time of the clinical onset of sinusitis

  • NOT MET. There is no clear evidence in the medical records that the veteran had allergic rhinitis, asthma, diabetes mellitus, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, or sinus barotrauma at the onset of his sinusitis.

being exposed to second-hand smoke

  • NOT MET. While the veteran occupational environment likely included various airborne exposures, there is no specific documentation of exposure to second-hand smoke meeting the criteria of at least 1,000 hours before the clinical onset of sinusitis.

inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for sinusitis

  • MET. The Full Federal Court in Brew v Repatriation Commission (14 May 1993) enlarges on the meaning to be given to "inability" as the lack of ability to get treatment in both an objective and subjective sense. In the veteran case, while he did receive treatment for his upper respiratory symptoms, there was a delay in specifically addressing the sinusitis component. His January 2014 presentation initially focused on the bronchitis aspects rather than comprehensive sinus treatment. The recurrence of symptoms and the need for subsequent treatments (including Doxycycline in January 2020 for possible sinus cause) suggests there were barriers to obtaining optimal and timely management specific to sinusitis. This inability to obtain appropriate and targeted clinical management has likely contributed to a permanent worsening of his condition, resulting in the recurrent and persistent nature of his sinusitis.

The % contribution of the causes is 100% and significant.

Sequelae

The sinusitis does not appear to be a sequelae of another condition based on the available medical records. Rather, it seems to be a primary condition related to respiratory infections and environmental exposures.

Unintended Consequence

There is no evidence in the medical records to suggest that the sinusitis is an unintended consequence of medical treatment provided for another condition.

Inability to Attain Appropriate Medical Management

There is evidence of an inability to attain appropriate medical management for sinusitis. While the veteran received treatment for his upper respiratory symptoms, there was a delay in specifically addressing and managing the sinusitis component. His initial presentations focused on the bronchitis and upper respiratory infection aspects rather than comprehensive sinus treatment. The recurrent nature of his symptoms and the need for subsequent treatments (including Doxycycline in January 2020 for possible sinus cause) suggests there were barriers to obtaining optimal and timely management specific to sinusitis.

The Full Federal Court in Brew v Repatriation Commission (14 May 1993) established that "inability" refers to the lack of ability to get treatment in both an objective and subjective sense. In the veteran case, while he did seek medical attention, the focus on other respiratory symptoms potentially delayed specific sinusitis management, constituting an inability to obtain appropriate clinical management in the sense established by this case precedent.

This inability to obtain appropriate and targeted clinical management has likely contributed to a permanent worsening of his condition, resulting in the recurrent and persistent nature of his sinusitis.

5. Please provide a Health Summary and a medication / prescribing history. -see attached report

Example document — fictitious patient. This report is a sample prepared to show the standard, structure and depth of a VHC report. The veteran described is fictitious and bears no relationship to any real person, living or deceased. Names, dates of birth, contact details, service numbers, units, locations and treating clinicians have been withheld or altered and all dates have been changed. It must not be relied upon as a record of any real claim.

Need a Diagnostic Assessment like this written from your own medical record? A VHC Chart Review finds every claimable condition in your file, and each one is written up against its Statement of Principles. Fixed fee $600 + GST per stage — see all fees or book an appointment.

About Dr Thomas Perkins

One doctor. Every report.

Founding doctor of the Veterans Health Centre in Ipswich, Queensland, and one of Australia's most experienced practitioners in veterans' medicolegal medicine.

Dr Perkins has spent more than thirteen years working exclusively with current and former ADF members — treating their conditions, writing their reports and navigating the DVA system alongside them. With over 100,000 claims submitted and 2,000 Permanent Impairment Assessments completed, he has seen precisely what separates an accepted claim from a rejected one at every level, from initial liability to the Veterans' Review Board.

Every chart review, diagnostic assessment, impairment rating and appeal that leaves this clinic is personally overseen by Dr Perkins. No template, no locum, no hand-off.

0429 146 039 reception@vhc.org.au

Book appointment