SoP Library › Fracture

Statement of Principles

Fracture — DVA SoP factors

Every factor in the Repatriation Medical Authority Statements of Principles for Fracture. DVA can only accept a claim for Fracture if at least one of these factors is met and connected to your service. Reasonable Hypothesis (RH) applies to operational service; Balance of Probabilities (BoP) applies to peacetime service.

Source: Repatriation Medical Authority Statements of Principles as held by the Veterans Health Centre. SoPs are amended and replaced regularly; always confirm the current instrument at rma.gov.au before relying on it.

Fracture

RH No. 62 of 2024 · BoP No. 63 of 202415 factors

Meaning of fracture: For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, fracture: (a) means an acquired break of bone as a result of an applied force that ordinarily would cause bone breakage in a healthy bone; and (b) includes: (i) acute vascular shock, acute compartment syndrome, or fat embolism resulting from the fractured bone; (ii) avulsion, crush, comminuted, burst, or blowout fracture; (iii) closed or compound/open fracture; (iv) fracture of bone contiguous with an orthopaedic implant; and (v) growth plate fractures; (vi) periosteal, muscular, fascial, skin, nerve or vascular damage directly caused by the displaced fractured bone; (vii) stress fracture of the fatigue type; (viii) torsion or spiral fracture; and (ix) wound infection as a result of penetration of the skin by bony fracture fragments (compound fracture); (c) excludes: (i) pathological fracture; (ii) bone stress injury/bone marrow oedema not being a stress fracture; (iii) stress fracture of the insufficiency type; (iv) osteonecrosis; (v) periostitis; (vi) fracture of teeth; (vii) fracture of cartilage; (viii) fracture of an orthopaedic implant including a screw, nail, fixation plate or prosthesis; and (ix) spondylolysis.

Reasonable Hypothesis (RH) — Statement of Principles No. 62 of 2024

At least one of the following factors must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting fracture or death from fracture with the circumstances of a person's relevant service:

  1. (1)
    having significant physical force applied to or through the affected bone at the time of clinical onset;
  2. (2)
    for stress fracture only, having significant repetitive loading stress to the affected bone prior to clinical onset;

    Note: Examples of situations involving significant repetitive loading stress includes military training, weight training, athletics or running.

  3. (3)
    for stress fracture only, having significant chronic repetitive loading stress to the affected bone due to abnormal force intensity or direction of application, at the time of clinical onset;

    Note: An example of chronic repetitive stress due to changed force intensity or force direction would be an uncorrected substantial leg length inequality, or a substantial valgus or varus joint malalignment.

  4. (4)
    smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products, during treatment for fracture prior to fracture non- union;

    Note: One gram of tobacco is considered to be equivalent to one cigarette.

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  5. (5)
    having diabetes mellitus at the time of the fracture non-union;

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  6. (6)
    having osteoporosis at the time of the fracture non-union;

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  7. (7)
    having vitamin D deficiency, with a serum 25(OH)D level of less than 50 nanomoles per litre at the time of the fracture non-union;

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  8. (8)
    having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 40 or greater at the time of the fracture non-union;

    Note: BMI is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary.

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  9. (9)
    inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for fracture before clinical worsening;

Balance of Probabilities (BoP) — Statement of Principles No. 63 of 2024

6 factors

At least one of the following factors must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, fracture or death from fracture is connected with the circumstances of a person's relevant service:

  1. (1)
    having significant physical force applied to or through the affected bone at the time of clinical onset;
  2. (2)
    for stress fracture only, having significant repetitive loading stress to the affected bone prior to clinical onset;

    Note: Examples of situations involving significant repetitive loading stress includes military training, weight training, athletics or running.

  3. (3)
    for stress fracture only, having significant chronic repetitive loading stress to the affected bone due to abnormal force intensity or direction of application, at the time of clinical onset;

    Note: An example of chronic repetitive stress due to changed force intensity or force direction would be an uncorrected substantial leg length inequality, or a substantial valgus or varus joint malalignment.

  4. (4)
    smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products, during treatment for fracture prior to fracture non- union;

    Note: One gram of tobacco is considered to be equivalent to one cigarette.

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  5. (5)
    having diabetes mellitus at the time of the fracture non-union;

    Note: Fracture non-union is considered to be a clinical worsening of the fracture.

  6. (6)
    inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for fracture before clinical worsening;

A VHC Diagnostic Assessment addresses each of these factors one by one against your service record and clinical history. See how a VHC DVA claim works, see all fees ($600 + GST per stage) or book an appointment.

Accepted — what is it worth?

A Statement of Principles decides one thing only: whether DVA accepts liability for fracture. It says nothing about how much you are paid. Compensation is worked out separately, from impairment points under the GARP — so a condition can be accepted and still rate few points, or rate more than you expect once it is combined with everything else on your file.

Presumptive liability · from 1 July 2026

Fracture may be accepted without proving the link to service

Fracture is listed in Part 2 of the determination as attributable to defence service, provided the criteria below are met.

  • Qualifying service: Any defence service.
    Onset: during the qualifying service.

A diagnosis is still required, and the presumption may not apply where there is clear evidence of a cause other than service. "Onset" means when an injury was sustained, or when all the signs and symptoms of a disease were first present — not the date of diagnosis. Applies to claims made on or after 1 July 2026.

How presumptive liability works →

Part of DVA Claims — Bones & joints — every Statement of Principles covering the bones and joints.

Others in this area:

Dr Thomas Perkins, Veterans Health Centre

Reviewed by Dr Thomas Perkins

Founding doctor, Veterans Health Centre · former RAAF aviation medical officer · 13 years working exclusively with ADF members and veterans. Full profile →